Z-DAY from Peter Thomas on Vimeo. "In late October 2009 a meteor crashed into St Werberghs, Bristol U.K. While the initial damage was contained efficiently and promptly by the authorities, Solanum-based particles from the meteor quickly spread on the wind, infecting many of the local population and causing a class-2 zombie infestation/outbreak. Within hours, the walking dead had descended on Broadmead Shopping Centre in search of meat and brains... Few survived and many souls were lost that day, however a blood-stained video tape from a local underground film-maker was recovered from the wreckage... Following a press black-out, this film documents the fateful event (dubbed "Z-Day" by locals), and provides a rare and privileged insight into a full-scale zombie attack on a densly populated urban area."
Flavorwire » Blog Archive » DJ /rupture’s Favorite Cities and Songs "Bristol is amazing, and it’s especially amazing for all sorts of different types of bass music. For a track, it’s hard to say, because there’s so much dub, dubstep, UK garage, reggae, as well… all this stuff coming out of Bristol. But my favorite spot in Bristol, I think it’s a Sunday night party, is at this place called Cosies."
"Dilip Krishnan and Rob Fergus at New York University created the camera in an attempt to do away with intrusive regular flashes.
"To make their "dark flash" camera, they modified a flashbulb to emit light over a wider range of frequencies and filter out visible light. The pair also had to remove the filters that usually prevent a camera's silicon image sensor detecting IR and UV rays.
"Although the dark flash gives a crisp image without disturbing those in the picture, the results have an odd colour balance that looks like a view through a night-vision scope.
"To give the pictures more normal hues, Krishnan and Fergus used colour information from a brief, flash-free photograph of the same scene taken quickly after the dark flash image.
"The second image is dim and blurry, and so it lacks some of the fine detail of its dark flash twin. However, the researchers use software to combine the sharp detail from the first image with the natural colours from the second image, resulting in a remarkably natural end result.
"The results are similar to those achieved by using a long exposure without a flash, like this image. But a long exposure shot requires those in the image to remain still for a few seconds to avoid creating motion blurs. The dark flash technique uses short exposure times that prevent those problems."
This is a very useful looking tool. On the one hand it would be great for low light shots of easily disturbed subjects, such as pets or kids. On the other it would be a gift to the stalker / paparazzi contingent, eager to get shots of people with minimum intervention.
Imagine the day when this is standard on digital compacts / camera phones and anyone could be taking photos anywhere. A market would open up in ways to combat the intrusion. Perhaps with some form of personal alarm to the combined presence of IR & UV (as both are common enough individually) in the absence of natural light.
Some dyes used in clothing glow in UV so could the same technique be applied? Maybe with jewellery, a ring or bracelet or watch strap, that glows in IR & UV but is too dim to be seen in natural light. If you catch a glimpse of a flash from it when you're out in a club you know someone must have a stalker cam near by. Check your drink.
Hardly a surprise when you have so many teenage actors in the spotlight, but what's shocking about this story is this line:
"The court heard police found shots of the plants on Mr Waylett's camera after he was arrested for taking a picture of officers [my emphasis] as he and a friend drove past."
"At the heart of the present controversy is the question of when behaviour becomes suspicious. Advice we have received suggests that the police may arrest an individual under PACE s.1 or the Terrorism Act s.44 where they have reasonable suspicion that an illegal act is being carried out.
"In other words, photography on its own is not suspicious behaviour: police suspicions need to be grounded in other evidence, and it is not reasonable to throw a blanket suspicion over the activities of all photographers.
"Yet here is the Met guidance in respect of s.44: "Officers have the power to view digital images contained in mobile telephones or cameras... provided that the viewing is to determine whether the images... are of a kind, which could be used in connection with terrorism."
"Not quite. The Met guidelines make no mention of reasonable suspicion: in effect, they duck the single issue that is at the heart of so much grief."